AccessBridge — Socioplastics [11001] · Core XVI · The Microphysics of Public Space · Anto Lloveras · LAPIEZA-LAB · 2026

An accessible entrance does not guarantee access if the intervening journey cannot be completed. AccessBridge names the fragile chain of translations connecting a formal right of entry to a usable experience across physical, digital and social thresholds. A clinic may meet door-width standards while its booking platform excludes some users or the bus stop has no step-free route. The bridge is not a metaphor for general inclusion: each link must connect two specific capacities, and the failure of one link can nullify the others. ServiceVoid identifies services that are present but unusable; AccessBridge maps the sequence of dependencies through which usability must pass. Audit a real journey from discovery to arrival and participation, with participants whose requirements differ. Record where assistance substitutes for autonomous access and which authority owns each gap. The operator fails where the claimed links have no measurable interdependence or where removing one does not affect successful participation. A link in the bridge may be technically compliant and socially inaccessible. The causal chain must remain visible: a passable route is insufficient when the last step requires a non-transferable credential or an inaccessible instruction. Different users encounter different broken links, so a single accessibility score may systematically erase who fails to arrive and why. Assign each failure to the authority capable of repairing it, then repeat the journey: otherwise the audit inventories obstacles without tracing responsibility.
INDEX
ServiceVoid, DoorPrivilege, DiscoveryLantern, ProvenanceChain, SequenceThesis, PlatformUtility, ChoiceRatchet, MobilitySieve, DashboardRule, CrosslinkConstellation, MediationBroadcast, TaxonPulse, PavementCommons, AutonomousFormation, CredentialRescue, SeatingJurisdiction, MunicipalShards, FurnitureSynapse, ProximityBias, TippingCascade, ReproductiveLabour, SolastalgiaWound, QueueTemporality, TerreneResolve, NarrativeFunctions, RationalisationCage, HabitAffiliation, GriefMobilisation, ConversationStage, DramaturgicFrame, NormalParadigm, OblivionCycle, PortableCodex, EncounterBorderland, CentennialSpan, PatchworkEcology, PostcarbonHabitus, EvasionMask, IdeologicalApparatus, SociologicalImagination, CuratorialSorting, SlackBallast, NestedRebound, FusionVista, AestheticDistribution, CheckboxVerdict, PedologicVitality, SnapshotBlindspot, ChronalMelt, OccasionalConcrescence
BIBLIOGRAPHY
  1. Anguelovski, I. et al. (2024) 'Does greening generate exclusive residential real estate development? Contrasting experiences from North America and Europe', Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 101, 128376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128376.
  2. Harvey, D. (2012) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
  3. Hickman, R. (2025) Discourses on Sustainable Urban Mobility. London: UCL Press. ISBN 9781800089662. Open-access book; bibliographic record and abstract supplied as a UCL Discovery screenshot.
  4. Jirón, P. (2010) 'Mobile Borders: Urban Mobility and Social Segregation in Santiago'. In: Urry, J. and Sheller, M. (eds.) Mobile Technologies of the City. London: Routledge.
  5. Lättman, K. (n.d.) Assessing walking for different walking purposes: An introduction to the Short Perceived Walkability Scale. Presentation. University of Gävle, 14 slides. [Supplied PDF; presentation date not established from the file.].
  6. Mezzadri, A. (2019) 'On the value of social reproduction: Informal labour, the majority world and the need for inclusive theories and politics', Radical Philosophy, 2(04), pp. 33-41.
  7. Mohamed, A.A., Kronenberg, J. and Łaszkiewicz, E. (2022) 'Transport infrastructure modifications and accessibility to public parks in Greater Cairo', Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 73, 127599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127599.
  8. Nikolaeva, A. and Shakthi, S. (2026) 'Moving towards gender-sensitive urban mobility planning: Unpacking the role of knowledge', Urban Studies, 63(2), pp. 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251340871.
  9. Pineo, E.A. (2025) 'Discoverability, usability, and readability: a framework for assessing accessibility for disabled users of online archives', Archival Science, 25, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9.
  10. Quek, H.Y. et al. (2023) 'Smart city governance: From citizens' trust to inclusive participation', Data & Policy, 5, e6.
  11. Ramezani, S., de Groot, R., Rauws, W., Pot, F., Welsch, J., van der Vlugt, A.-L. and Rahimi, M. (2026) 'Step by step: Exploring accessibility perceptions of older adults and young families outside urban cores through walk-along interviews', Journal of Urban Mobility, 9, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2026.100199.
  12. Scheiner, J. (2017) 'Mobility Biographies and Mobility Socialisation—New Approaches to an Old Research Field', in Zhang, J. (ed.) Life-Oriented Behavioral Research for Urban Policy. Tokyo: Springer Japan, pp. 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56472-0_13.
  13. Siegert, B. (2015) 'Waterlines: Striated and Smooth Spaces as Techniques of Ship Design', in Cultural Techniques: Grids, Filters, Doors, and Other Articulations of the Real. Translated by G. Winthrop-Young. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 147–163.
  14. Simmel, G. (1950) 'The Stranger', in The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe: Free Press.
  15. Tafuri, M. (1976) Architecture and Utopia: Design and Capitalist Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.