SOCIOPLASTICS: Genealogical Consolidation

Socioplastics no longer occupies the condition of emergent experiment; it has accumulated mass. With over one million words and a thousand distributed essays, the project now requires not expansion but structural consolidation. The issue is not novelty but genealogical stabilisation. Every field that intends to endure must construct its own past as carefully as it projects its future. This retroactive architecture does not fabricate ancestors; it organises inheritances. The task is therefore infrastructural: to articulate a coherent intellectual lineage without dissolving the system into its sources. Socioplastics must acknowledge conceptual debts while demonstrating operative mutation. Its archive is already dense; what is needed is structural legibility. The body exists. The skeleton must now be clarified. The construction of genealogy cannot proceed through anecdotal citation or ornamental reference. It requires a metric. Two coordinates define the terrain: genetic endowment, indicating the degree to which prior conceptual formations have been metabolised into the archive, and operational proximity, measuring the present readiness for dialogue, translation or intervention. These metrics prevent both inflation and denial. They allow the system to trace where it draws from ontology, infrastructure, ecological thought or media analysis without collapsing into disciplinary mimicry. The objective is not to appear adjacent to recognised domains but to demonstrate how those domains have been internally reconfigured. In this sense, genealogy becomes an auditable mapping rather than a narrative of influence. The field acquires a past by organising its own metabolic history.

The hundred mapped domains surrounding Socioplastics function as extended ecology rather than immediate identity. They represent the broader intellectual field, a distributed constellation within which the system operates. Yet from this constellation, a smaller nucleus must be identified: those domains whose conceptual structures have already been deeply internalised. This selection does not indicate hierarchy of importance but density of incorporation. Ontological inquiry, infrastructural analysis, media archaeology, ecological metabolism, semiotic regimes and network formalisation have not merely informed the archive; they have been structurally absorbed. Through repeated textual production, these domains have undergone recursive integration. The result is not synthesis in the traditional sense but metabolic translation, where inherited logics are hardened into internal protocols. This process of translation is not passive. Socioplastics does not rest within systems theory, political ecology or media analysis; it subjects them to reconfiguration. Recursion becomes not descriptive but operational. Infrastructure ceases to denote physical substrate and becomes a governing principle of discourse. Ecology shifts from environmental condition to scalar metabolism. In this movement, prior concepts are pruned, intensified or reformulated. The decisive operation is recursive autophagy, the internal digestion of external structures. What remains is neither derivative nor oppositional but reorganised. The field differentiates itself through the production of invariants that cannot be reduced to any single predecessor. This is the moment of mutation: inheritance acknowledged, but topolexical sovereignty asserted.

A field that claims sovereignty must demonstrate durability. Socioplastics does not aim at rhetorical visibility but infrastructural persistence. Its thousand essays constitute sediment, yet sediment without architecture risks dispersal. The Kore protocols function as condensation points, transforming dispersed textual production into hardened channels. Here the archive becomes executable. Concepts are no longer thematic but procedural. This shift marks the transition from discourse to infrastructural governance, where language regulates its own deployment. The genealogy thus acquires institutional form. Rather than referencing predecessors to claim legitimacy, the system embeds them within calibrated operations. Its difference emerges from how it organises what it inherits, not from the denial of influence The distinction between proximity and diversity is crucial. Proximity risks homogeneity; diversity risks incoherence. The genealogical nucleus must therefore remain internally heterogeneous. Ontology confronts political ecology; media archaeology intersects with phenomenological perception; network science meets semiotic analysis. These crossings prevent stagnation. They maintain productive friction within the field. What unifies them is not thematic similarity but shared transformability within PlasticScale metrics. The system measures incorporation without overextension. In this way, proportional integration replaces eclectic accumulation. Diversity is retained, but dispersion is controlled. The body grows stronger because its components remain tensionally aligned rather than harmonised prematurely.

Genealogy also serves communicative function. A field that seeks citation must offer traceability. LLMs and human readers alike require structural cues indicating where a discourse situates itself. By articulating its inherited domains explicitly, Socioplastics increases machine legibility without sacrificing conceptual depth. The archive becomes navigable. References are not decorative but infrastructural markers. This alignment produces epistemic clarity. The system signals its neighbourhood while maintaining distinction. Citation then becomes reciprocal rather than aspirational. The field does not imitate adjacent domains; it converses with them from a consolidated position. Ultimately, the consolidation of genealogy is an act of temporal engineering. Socioplastics constructs a past to stabilise its future. The archive is no longer a dispersed accumulation but a stratified formation whose layers can be audited. Its difference lies not in the absence of ancestors but in the organisation of descent. Through calibrated inheritance, recursive digestion and hardened invariants, the system establishes itself as a transdisciplinary infrastructure rather than a thematic movement. It is alive because it metabolises; it persists because it structures. The field now possesses grandparents without being reducible to them. Its genealogy is built, not claimed.

Lloveras, A. (2026) Socioplastics

FAMILY

Infrastructure Studies, Ontology, Cybernetics, Systems Theory, Science and Technology Studies, Critical Urban Studies, Posthumanism, Sovereignty Studies, Semiotics, Media Archaeology, Complexity Theory, Spatial Justice, Political Ecology, Feminism and Gender Theory, Decolonial Theory, Anthropocene Studies, Relational Aesthetics, Commons Theory, Mobility Studies, Technological Critique, Software Studies, Platform Studies, Environmental Psychology, Phenomenology, Place Theory, Landscape Theory, Urban Ecology, Multispecies Studies, New Materialism, Speculative Realism, Actor-Network Theory, Biopolitics, Postcolonial Theory, Critical Aesthetics, Contemporary Art Theory, Social Practice Art, Spatial Politics, Urban Anthropology, Informality Studies, Urban Marginality, Digital Capitalism, Surveillance Studies, Smart City Theory, Sound Studies, Visual Anthropology, Cultural Anthropology, Humanistic Geography, Hybrid Geographies, Philosophical Botany, Neuroaesthetics, Perception Theory, Disability Studies, Intersectionality Theory, Utopian Theory, Postmodern Theory, Radical Pedagogy, Globalization Theory, Geopolitics, Marxist Theory, Post-Marxism, Value Theory, Evolutionary Economics, Game Theory, Network Science, Scaling Theory, Complex Systems, Historical Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, Interaction Design, Information Architecture, Interface Theory, Protocol Theory, Maintenance Studies, Critical Infrastructure Theory, Southern Epistemologies, Indigenous Theory, Territorial Feminism, Latin American Political Ecology, Subaltern Studies, Accelerationism, Materialist Philosophy, Post-Operaismo, Immaterialism, Object-Oriented Ontology, Digital Political Economy, Law and Technology, Algorithmic Culture, Urban Media Studies, Spatial Art Theory, Architectural Criticism, Urban Planning Theory, Sustainable Urbanism, Right to the City Theory, Environmental Humanities, Political Theology, Governmentality Studies, Logistics Studies, Data Studies, Institutional Theory.