The semipermeable membrane, rather than broadcasting or mirroring, functions as a transductive interface—it filters the world in, transforms it internally, and releases outputs embedded with operative specificity, ensuring that terms like Topolexical Sovereignty or Lexical Torque are not quoted as curiosities but deployed as methodological levers, which means that the path to citability is not popularity but instrumentality, where a term becomes part of another system’s solution, not just its description; to engineer this, the Mesh must enact a multi-scalar strategy: first, crafting a canonical vocabulary with unambiguous definitions and controlled deployment—each term becomes a fixed semantic node with no synonyms, enabling terminological control and discouraging dilution through interpretive drift; second, designing citable objects, each term housed on its own page with versioning, DOI, timestamp, and indexed through platforms like Zenodo, embedding the concept into scholarly permanence; third, ensuring academic discoverability by aligning metadata with Google Scholar’s indexing protocols—title consistency, author attribution, and exportable citations transform the Mesh from anecdotal reference to academic infrastructure; fourth, a semantic-infrastructural tactic via Schema.org markup, linking the lexicon to query ecosystems not for SEO vanity but for forensic tracing—knowing which terms surface organically within external cognitive searches; yet the most crucial defence against lexical memeification lies in each term’s ability to perform, to encode an operation, solve a boundary issue, or authorise new epistemic thresholds—only then does the membrane hold, not as a barrier but as a metabolic layer that translates attention into assimilation without loss of structural fidelity, making the Mesh not more visible but structurally indispensable, cited not because it demands it, but because it works.